Moderators: Peter Dowling, Peter Moir, MrBenn, Peter Taylor, JulesTheBit, middlepillar
anguillacop wrote:I am relatively new to Masonry and generally enjoying life as a Mason and have made some particular friends among several Brethren in the Lodge. I attend all meetings and in the 2.5 yrs since being a member have attended all but one LOI. I am a Steward this year and will be one next season. However, I am frustrated by what appears to be a lack of transparency in decision making (I know its not a democracy). I have always been told that progression should be on merit and ability. I was told at an early stage that regardless of attendance and support all offices are offered in strict seniority in terms of how long one has been a member. So one could sit on the back benches doing very little and take an office just because its your turn. In addition it is clear that all other offices - Temple Committee, Provincial Committee et al are decided by a small clique and presented as a fait accompli. I come from a professional background where transparency and integrity in public service were key. I believe the current system is wrong and a little un masonic. Am I being over sensitive? And if not what might be the best way to address this without becoming a variance with others and destroying the harmony of the lodge?
Return to What can be done to Improve Freemasonry
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests